Thursday, March 22, 2012

World Water Day 2012

By coincidence, our CSA delivery day this week falls on the UN's World Water Day 2012:
There are 7 billion people to feed on the planet today and another 2 billion are expected to join by 2050. Statistics say that each of us drinks from 2 to 4 litres of water every day, however most of the water we ‘drink’ is embedded in the food we eat: producing 1 kilo of beef for example consumes 15,000 litres of water while 1 kilo of wheat ’drinks up’ 1,500 litres.

When a billion people in the world already live in chronic hunger and water resources are under pressure we cannot pretend the problem is ‘elsewhere’. Coping with population growth and ensuring access to nutritious food to everyone call for a series of actions we can all help with:
  • follow a healthier, sustainable diet;
  • consume less water-intensive products
  • reduce the scandalous food wastage: 30% of the food produced worldwide is never eaten and the water used to produce it is definitively lost!
  • produce more food, of better quality, with less water.
As residents of an arid basin surrounded by mountains on one side and the Pacific ocean on another, most of our region's food and fresh water is imported over high mountain passes. Ironically, less energy may be required to truck vegetables from the Central Valley over the El Tejon pass aka "The Grapevine" (4160') than to grow vegetables locally inside our basin with water imported via aquaducts reaching ~750'.

Why? Because water is heavy and crops need water nearly continuously throughout their growing cycle.

Worry not about what your CSA box does to your annual carbon budget. Farmer Tanaka employs ultra-efficient drip irrigation, often in conjunction with plastic row covers that minimize evaporative losses from the soil, AND he uses reclaimed water from the Irvine Ranch Water District.
On my farm here in Irvine we use a drip irrigation system on our crops that puts the water right in the root zone so as to use our precious water as efficiently as possible with no runoff. We also use reclaimed water supplied by the IRWD (Irvine Ranch Water District) who produces the cleanest and safest reclaimed water in the country.
Using reclaimed water gives the added benefit of not adding salts to his soil. Gardeners in this region may be familiar with the heavy load of salts in our "hard" water. If we irrigate regularly with hard water and the water evaporates or is taken up by the plants, you may notice a white powdery substance left behind. That's the salt building up in the soil. (Even if you are not a gardener, you can see the white calcium salt deposits in your kitchen and bathroom.)

If the winter rains do not come to flush the salts away, gardeners and farmers need to deep water (often repeatedly) the land to flush the salts away artificially. This is very water intensive.

The reclaimed water is so pure, it doesn't have the salts found in freshly-imported river water. Thus, Farmer Tanaka can drip irrigate just the amount needed by his plants, without worrying about poisoning his fields with salt.

What does that mean for your CSA food? It may have a lower carbon and water footprint than even food you grow in your own backyard*.

* Residents of north Redondo Beach get about half our water supply from local aquifers, which are replenished with reclaimed water from West Basin Water District's Edward C. Little Water Recycling Facility in El Segundo, California. Read a report about a visit to the facility. You can also learn more in walking my watershed.

Unfortunately, pumping the water into the ground and then pumping it back up uses energy and loads the water up with salts. I'd much rather use the cleaner reclaimed water directly from the plant, but the general public is still resistant due to the "eww" factor. I hope you will be a vector for getting the truth out.

Addendum:
Have you noticed that people have completely irrational beliefs in the purification capacity of nature vs. industrial facilities? For instance, cities draw their water from a river, treat it, use and then treat their sewage so it is cleaner than the river water they originally took in. Yet, instead of using the treated water, they dump it into the river so it can pick up more chemicals (often running off farmland) before the next city downriver goes through the same cycle.

I see the same absurdity in the West Basin water district injecting the water into the aquifer so it can pick up salts before they pump it back up again to treat and deliver to our homes.

Or the Fiji water marketing speak about how Fiji's water is purified by the tradewinds.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Don't pin me down

I've been watching the experiments of other bloggers with Pinterest with interest. As interesting as it looks, I just haven't had the time to play around with it. I did find out via email that some of my images from this blog and Flickr were "pinned" in Pinterest.

Initially, I was flattered and interested in watching the viral life of imagery. But I also found it slightly disturbing as the image was repinned, and attribution was lost. It's one thing if you like an image on someone's blog and download it to your personal hard drive for your own personal mood board.

But it's another thing when someone who has never even heard of this blog and is not familiar with the source at all repins an image they found on Pinterest. The image has lost it's provenance. And provenance is how we assign credit.

This is a noncommercial blog. I purposely set out to create a blog where I don't try to sell you on anything except that you should develop and exercise your own ingenuity and bullshit detector. I made the decision not to try to profit off this blog. So I don't want others to take what they find here and put it on Pinterest so someone else can profit off it.

Read the Pinterest Terms of Use:

Key Terms related to Content

"Content" means text, graphics, images, music, software, audio, video, information or other materials.

"Pinterest Content" means all Content that Cold Brew Labs makes available through the Site, Application or Service, including any Content licensed from a third party, but excluding Member Content.

"Member" means a person that completes Cold Brew Labs’ account registration process, as described under "Account Registration" below.

"Member Content" means all Content that a Member posts, uploads, publishes, submits or transmits to be made available through the Site, Application or Services.

"Site Content" means Member Content and Pinterest Content.

[and then later on...]

Ownership

The Site, Application, Services and Site Content are protected by copyright, trademark, and other laws of the United States and foreign countries. Except as expressly provided in these Terms, Cold Brew Labs and its licensors exclusively own all right, title and interest in and to the Site, Application, Services and Site Content, including all associated intellectual property rights. You will not remove, alter or obscure any copyright, trademark, service mark or other proprietary rights notices incorporated in or accompanying the Site, Application, Services or Site Content.

[emphasis added.]

Uploading content that you do not own the rights to means that you have given Pinterest/Cold Brew Labs intellectual property rights that are not yours to give.

I'm watching the Pinterest vehicle with all the curiosity of a scientist, technologist and crafter. But I am not ready to hand over my intellectual property rights in such a broad and blanket manner. As the footer on this blog says:
All content copyright © 2005-2012 badmomgoodmom. All rights reserved.
Note:
It's fine to quote small passages or a thumbnail on your blog and link back if you are making a point that moves the discussion forward. I consider that fair use. But, if you are going to use any more than that, please ask permission. By the number of guest posts I write for other bloggers, you can see that I am fine with sharing content as long as I get attribution and keep my intellectual property rights.

Aside:
I am currently writing a white paper about data provenance so I am very interested how long it takes for imagery to lose its provenance and in the fallout over Pinterest's terms of use.

Interesting analysis from a lawyer/photographer/Pinterest user:
DDK Portraits: Why I tearfully deleted my Pinterest inspiration boards
DDK Portraits: Top 50 responses to questions about Pinterest

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Happy Half Tau Day

Even though I concur with Bob Palais that Pi is Wrong, I hope you have a good day tomorrow.

I am swamped at home and at work, and the tutorial on how to knit a circle in any stitch pattern will have to wait. Perhaps Tau day would be a good target deadline. After all, the method relies on the crucial fact that
circumference = τ*radius
which looks so much more elegant than
circumference = 2*π*radius

I never did like how it takes 2π radians to go one full rotation. The beauty of τ is that one τ is one rotation. How intuitively easy to remember! τ and π were both in historical usage but π had better PR and edged out the more elegant τ.

May I suggest you view Vi Hart's lighthearted take, Pi is (still Wrong)?



Math and physics aficionados should read Pi is Wrong and the Tau Manifesto. The first time I read Pi is Wrong, I smacked myself on the forehead. Doh, why didn't I think of it before? I am not to blame for those pesky factors of two; it's the stupid notation! Read section 3.1 Quadratic Forms of the Tau Manifesto and admire the elegance and consistency.

Aside:
I took Numerical Analysis with Bob Palais while he was teaching at UC Berkeley. It was a really fun class and I never forgot the lessons he taught me. I remember the day he explained higher order Runge-Kutta schemes and their numerical stability looked to be the best thing since sliced bread. Then he broke out in a rendition of The Rolling Stones' You can't always get what you want.

Unfortunately, there is always a catch. Numerical stability and accuracy is gained at the cost of computational speed and memory usage.

When I needed to implement Runge-Kutta integration of Hamiltonian systems for my PhD research, I found myself humming the Rolling Stones. I found the right trade-off balance so that my molecular dynamics simulations converged quickly and accurately enough to allow me to graduate. Thanks, Bob. ;-)