US Demographics vs Vogue Demographics

[In answer to Rebekka's comment.]

The Wikipedia article, Demographics of the United States, calculates:

The U.S. population's racial distribution in 2006 was as follows:^[22]

• Total population: 299 million
• White
  • Including 23.2 White Hispanics: 74% or 221.3 million
  • Not including White Hispanics: 66% or 198.1 million
• Hispanic or Latino of any race: 14.8% or about 44.3 million.^[23]
• Black or African American alone: 13.4% or 40.9 million
• Some other race alone: 6.5% or 19 million
• Asian alone: 4.4% or 13.1 million
• Two or more races: 2.0% or 6.1 million
• American Indian or Alaska Native alone: 0.68% or 2.0 million
• Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander alone: 0.14% or 0.43 million

The article cites the US Census Bureau's detailed tables of estimated 2006 Demographics.

So 100% white in the editorial content is very out of proportion relative to the rest of America. The ads use 92% white (non-celebrity) professional models, which only looks progressive when compared to Anna Wintour's vision.

But those are breakdowns for the total population, not the fashion-consuming public. Fashionistas are younger than average. Older Americans are much whiter than younger Americans. The younger you look, the browner we get. In some states, non-Hispanic whites are a minority in the under 25 population. Very soon, that will be true for the US as a whole. Models are drawn mainly from the under 25 population.

That fashion advertisers and Anna Wintour don't see this is a sign of their total cluelessness. Or maybe they are worse than clueless? Either interpretation is not very flattering to them.